Monthly Archives: February 2007

First off, I want to give you my betting plan and a quick glossary of betting phrases I use so you can understand the knowledge I bring to the table.

Bettors and investors alike tend to pick more winners than losers unless they have absolutely no idea what they are doing - what gets smart people in trouble is often overconfidence. By using principles of money management you can keep your bankroll alive and available to play throughout the whole season.

Geoff OgilvyRule #1 - Define your capital

Whether $100 or $1000 or $10,000, commit yourself to an amount you will risk for any given season and NEVER ADD TO IT. If you have lost all your bankroll based on your system, your system is flawed - adding more money to a failed system is throwing good money away. Try fantasy betting at www.nbx.com to find your rhythm.

Rule #2 - Never invest more than 25% of your capital in one bet.

So assuming $1000 of capital, you should never put more than $250 on one bet (no matter how much you believe in Chad Campbell or Tiger Woods). This way you suffer fewer no debilitating losses. You may prefer 10% or 20% - just define it below 30% and you should be fine. A corollary of this is to never have more than 80% at risk at one time - you would hate to wake up tomorrow and be out of cash.

Rule #3 - Define a confidence system

Many bettors like to bet the same amount on each opportunity, some want to put more money down on their best ideas. I will make reference to “units” throughout the season, and I define the unit as 5% of capital. If I want to dabble on a long-shot or just want to be in action, I put down 1 unit (e.g., I have one unit on Chad at 125-to-1 to win the WGC Match Play). But when it is time to get serious, I can go up to five units. I have no quantitative means to arrive at this - I am pretty quantitative in screening for opportunities, but I admit the confidence system is more intuitive.

Rule #4 - Stay disciplined

All the rules in the world are crap if you break them. The “Just this one time” crap may work on your significant other but you are only letting yourself down by coloring outside the lines. Another corollary - stay quiet. Few people are truly interested in your braggadocio especially if you do not share your “big beats”. Mostly keep your sports investing to yourself.

Rule #5 - Keep a journal

You may see patterns of failure or success that you wouldn’t have noticed otherwise. For instance I really believe Adam Scott is destined for greatness, but I lose betting with him more than anyone else. Knowing this I have adjusted my confidence units down on each bet now. Like those who were shorting Amazon stock in 1999 - they were right, it was only worth about 10% of the current value, but they were early. Unless they managed those losses they lost a lot of capital. I plan on posting the KC On Golf journal so you can see just how good or bad I am.

SO given all that, Saturday we like Nick O’Hern at +120 over Henrik Stenson (1 unit since he has advanced to the semis) and Geoff Ogilvy -125 over Paul Casey (Ogilvy may be overvalued as a 5:4 fave but a win is a win).

See our friends at Sportsbook.com to try out your ideas.

Tucson, AZ - It took twenty holes to knock off Tiger Woods today - something of which Nick O’Hern is intimately familiar at the Accenture WGC Match Play Championships.

Woods erased a 3-down lead but the crafty Aussie PGA Champ sunk a 15-foot putt for par to send Tiger back to his den. That den certainly is appointed luxuriously as Tiger had won seven straight PGA events, but O’Hern recreated his 2005 second-round upset on Friday to stop that streak.
O’Hern gets the other Tiger-stopper Henrik Stenson (Dubai) tomorrow.

On the gaming side, Chad Campbell (I admit to having a golf-man-crush on him) was a delicious 25-1 this AM on Sportsbook.com, and was also a +160 underdog to David Toms. Yummy. Toms has some big wins in his career but is rarely at the top of the All-Around stat ranking - to me a sign that he can always have a bad day. Hence, I am notorious for betting against him in matchups.

Stephen Ames knows the feeling from last year. He mouthed off a bit about his chances given Tiger Woods winning some tourneys despite not playing his best. They were matched up in the first round of the 2006 WGC-Accenture Match Play Championship.

The result? Seven birdies from Eldrick, a 29 on the front nine, an early lunch seating…and of course,

9 and 8.

The 2007 WGC has some amazing first-round matchups:

  1. Match 3 - 8:08am - Geoff Ogilvy vs. Steve Stricker (two former champs)
  2. Match 11 - 9:20am - Retief Goosen vs. Scott Verplank (two of the most boring interviews and best shotmakers)
  3. Match 17 - 10:17am - Sergio Garcia vs. Darren Clarke (intense wardrobes complement two intense match play warriors)

We will break these down, as well as our weekend predictions, in our podcast for Thursday!

Realtime Bracket from PGATour.com

Weekly Odds from GolfOdds.com

Nothing like a sudden death triple OT early in the season!

Courtesy AP Sports

Phil Mickelson’s trusty chipper failed him many times on his way to defeat at the hands of rock-steady Charles Howell III (above, aka “CH3″ ’round these parts).

“It’s been a long time,” Howell said. “I’m speechless.”

Yeah, the verbosity must pick up if America is to embrace “3″ as an up and coming golf star.

My recollection of the final hour was how quickly Lefty worked and how poorly both players executed under pressure. And of course Lefty is carrying about 25 pounds less around his center of gravity this season, which I believe will only help him in his pursuit of more majors.

More for KC and I on the podcast shortly.

Under ConstructionKC and I are again beginning to commence to get started on our own golf blog/podcast.

This should complete step one. We commit to post more often than Tiger plays in sanctioned PGA Tour events.
The weekly podcast will be the main focus of this endeavour.

Again, stay tuned and we appreciate your patience.